Operation Sindoor vs. the Office of Osama: Pakistan’s UNSC Presidency Countdown a Ticking Time Bomb for Global Security as the UN Allows a State Sponsor of Terror to Lead

India stands as the only world leader that truly excels in global security—unlike many so-called global powers that claim to be protectors of human rights and diplomatic balance. In recent times, Pakistani government officials, including their Defence Minister and Army Chief, have publicly confessed to crimes against India. Through media interviews, these officials have also admitted to orchestrating and supporting terrorist training for over 30 years.

As a student of Criminology in the United Kingdom nearly two decades ago, it was a well-known fact that Al-Qaeda was created by the American government to counter the USSR (now Russia), with Pakistan receiving substantial funding to train terrorists. This truth, long understood by national security experts and students studying crime and terrorism, has now been referenced in a recent Netflix documentary as well. For the first time, this content has reached the global masses, showing how Osama Bin Laden was born out of these policies and later assassinated. The documentary further confirms that Bin Laden lived in a high-security zone near the Pakistani Army cantonment, suggesting he was protected by the Pakistani armed forces.

It can be inferred that Pakistan continues to operate as a hub for global terrorist training, with the West remaining largely silent. This silence may be due to Pakistan’s ability to blackmail and extort Western powers by threatening to reveal the extent of their involvement in the creation of terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda. This manipulation of sensitive national security data resembles tactics used by the Chinese government, making Pakistan and China aligned in their approach. Meanwhile, the United States maintains a diplomatic stance with India, but Russia remains India’s long-standing and trusted ally.

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is not immune to these complexities. Pakistan is set to assume the rotating presidency of the UNSC for the month of July 2025. This 30-day countdown begins as June starts today.

During Pakistan’s previous presidency in 2012–2013, India faced severe repercussions, including alleged and confirmed attacks: the targeting of Israeli diplomats in New Delhi, the Pune bombings, Hyderabad blasts, attacks in Srinagar, Bangalore blast, Naxal attacks in Darbha Valley, Patna bombings, and more—many of which went underreported.

This upcoming term under Pakistan’s UNSC presidency already shows ominous signs. There have been attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh, a surge in sleeper cell infiltrations across India (primarily by Bangladeshis), the Pulwama tourist killings (where only men were killed, leaving women and children traumatised), and what India refers to as Operation Sindoor—an ongoing strategic and diplomatic response involving matters such as the Indus Water Treaty. In addition, the Israel–Palestine conflict has been observed in India with pro-Palestine rallies across the country, whereas defence experts have also alleged that the Pulwama attack was planned by Hamas, as they have now been relocated to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

Notably, during Pakistan’s previous UNSC presidency, Indian parliamentarians united to ratify the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC). During this new tenure, Indian lawmakers have once again come together—this time forming an all-party delegation to visit various nations and expose Pakistan’s dual role: acting as a diplomatic terrorist state while pretending to take an anti-terror stance. The delegation emphasizes that India, now a risen superpower, will no longer submit to backdoor diplomacy under the guise of peace, especially when Pakistan is acting as the control center for global terrorism.

Operation Sindoor is not just a response to the brutal killings of Indian citizens but a direct challenge to diplomatic terrorism carried out by Pakistan. The concern is particularly urgent as Pakistan prepares to preside over the UNSC—a position from which it could influence global narratives. Pakistan’s diplomatic actions have reached alarming levels. It has been alleged that the former UN Human Rights Chief was involved in a coup in Bangladesh that resulted in a genocide of Bangladeshi Hindus. The Pakistani Army Chief had also allegedly signaled the targeted killings of Hindu tourists in Jammu & Kashmir.

Meanwhile, Crimeophobia, a global criminology firm, has been working toward the implementation of UNTOC since the year it was ratified by the Indian Parliament. Despite this, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has allegedly shown favouritism toward Pakistani counterparts, who only recently began claiming involvement in UNTOC—clearly as a political manoeuvre ahead of their UNSC presidency. The documented presence of Crimeophobia’s UNTOC implementation initiatives also includes a criminal writ petition filed with the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in 2016 after detailed research from 2013 onwards in the subject matter.

A formal complaint has already been lodged by Crimeophobia’s founder, Criminologist Snehil Dhall, with the United Nations General Assembly. Relying on charters, articles, and legal proceedings of the UN, the complaint calls for the removal of officials from UNHRC and UNODC who have allegedly supported or enabled Pakistan’s terror-linked diplomacy. It also demands Pakistan’s removal from its current non-permanent membership of the UNSC.

India, through its diplomatic ecosystem, has made its position unequivocally clear: no recommendation from the West—especially under any form of diplomatic coercion—will be accepted. India refuses to legitimise diplomacy masked by blackmail and terror. Crimeophobia has also highlighted that India’s own Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), initiated in 1999 for internal security, preceded the global framework of UNTOC, which was formed in 2000 but remains poorly implemented worldwide.

If India were to accept Western diplomacy rooted in guilt and compromise, it would be no different from allowing Osama Bin Laden to lead a Pakistani delegation at the UN, even though he was assassinated by American forces in Pakistan as part of their surgical attack strategy—which India has also adopted. Today, the very office that once protected Bin Laden—the Government of Pakistan—is poised to preside over the UNSC.

It’s important to note that Operation Sindoor dealt a significant blow to the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terror outfit. Factual reports suggest that during the funerals of slain LeT operatives, Pakistani army personnel stood in solidarity with these designated terrorists. As July 2025 approaches, the world must ask itself:

Is the global community truly prepared to allow a state accused of fostering diplomatic terrorism and harbouring terrorist outfits to preside over the most powerful security council in the world—just because they might release sensitive data on the West’s creation of various terror groups?